California tenure decision could spark conversation |
|||
In June 2014, the Superior Court of California ruled in favor of students in the Vergara v. California case. It was considered a landmark decision by many as it was the first time a major court made a ruling on state educational tenure laws. Prior to Vergara v. California, the state had a "last in, first out" policy in which new teachers were the first to be laid off. The court decided this and other tenure practices were unconstitutional because they didn't support quality education for all students. Specifically, the court felt minorities were left with poorly qualified educators. Finding ways to open the conversation "I do hope this is an opportunity to start a dialogue outside the courtroom in part because teacher policy and employment protections, how to get high quality teachers into hard-to-staff classrooms and, importantly, how to close the teacher-quality gap - these are extremely complicated questions. It's going to take some really complex policy thinking and some conversations at the local level as well as the state level," Bill Koski, a professor at Stanford University's law school and graduate school of education, told NPR. Measuring teacher ability Alan Warhaftig, an English teacher at a magnet school in Los Angeles, explained to NPR that the assessment system does have some flaws. As he teaches accelerated students, his class is likely to perform well on tests whether or not he did a good job teaching them. By the same token, teachers who educate struggling students may have helped the kids make progress but not have the scores to reflect that fact. |
|